Skip to main content

Socialism and "Big Government"

There is not a form of left-anarchism or revolutionary socialism which states as its aim the strengthening of the state. This is a consistent fallacy propogated against socialism, the aim of which, ultimately, is the “withering away of the state”. The state is necessary, in the final analysis, to maintain the status quo where there is inequality and class division. So capitalism, despite everything the right-wing claim to say about “big government” desperately needs the state and its various institutions for its very survival. We see this in times of economic crises, when private banks and corporations look to the state to save them. We also see it most obviously through how the state maintains an army and police whose force is used in the interests of expanding / defending profit making markets and private property respectively. The aim of many socialists (and not all socialists and anarchists agree with each other on this) is to take control the state in order to use its institutions to implement socialist law and as a necessary to dismantling the state altogether. For a clear exposition on how reformist socialists, revolutionary socialists and anarchists define the state and its purpose etc., a good starting point is Lenin’s ‘State and Revolution’ which was written during the Russian Revolution in 1917. It’s freely available here: https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1917/staterev/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Elon Musk is a Genius

I keep seeing these "Elon Musk is a genius" posts. Educated professionals are stating, literally, that he's a genius. Is that the same Elon Musk who said "the coronavirus panic is dumb", who supports Kanye West for president of the US, and who named his child "X Æ A-12"? Is it the same Mr. Musk who has spent more $billions on blowing up rockets in an attempt to get a super-privileged few to live on Mars, after they've made life so intollerable through the environmental damage they've caused for the rest of us on Earth?

Sally Rooney's Normal People

A classic novel turned upside-down and inside-out: Normal People is just another cliché of classic romantic novels, of which Pride and Prejudice is probably the most obvious; a genre which has been repeated and imitated to death, and NP is another installment - well, readers of certain synopses might mistakenly think so.        The first page produces an immediate sense that "this is different"; the tension in a situation we have just entered (but that is familiar to us all), the eroticism, the anxiety (paradoxically, after they have received such good exam results - but the dreaded Leaving Cert is coming up), Connell's awkwardness; in short, it feels real.  If one was to compare it to P&P for its similar plot - and various sources have (8, 18) - one could also compare the realism of the characters of both novels; the accuracy and simplicity of the description and dialogue.        NP , like other great works of art, is a con...